Skip to the writing

Spotlighting the people making African film and television, and the stories they’re telling — wherever in the world they’re doing it.

Instagram / YouTube / X / TikTok / Letterboxd / Substack

Film

The Screen Score: Harmattan Season

The trade admired the control. The room wanted the ending it was promised. Both are right, and the gap is the whole review.

/ / 1 min read
The Screen Score: Harmattan Season

Twenty-three points is a wide gap, and wide gaps are usually a sign that a film is doing something deliberate that a portion of its audience did not sign up for. That is the case here.

The craft is not in question. The film is composed with real discipline, and it withholds on purpose. What the audience score is registering is not a failure of execution but a broken promise: the marketing sold a thriller and the film delivers a study.

Reading the gap

Qollom does not average these two figures, and this piece is the reason. An average of 72 would describe a film that pleased everyone slightly. No such film exists here.

The professional score says the thing is well made. The audience score says the thing was mis-sold. Both are useful. Collapsed into one number, neither survives.

We knew we were making a slow film. We did not entirely control how it was sold.

The director, at the post-screening Q&A

Please share your take if you've watched Harmattan Season (2026). If you haven't, no rating needed — it helps keep the ratings honest for everyone.

It held my attention throughout.
It was coherent and purposeful — I understood what it was trying to do.
The story or subject matter was compelling and made me care.
The characters, voices, or subjects felt authentic and present.
The technical craft — like sound, editing, or design — served the piece well.
It had a distinctive point of view that left a lasting impression.

Want to write a full review? Add it in the comments below after submitting.

Reviews for Harmattan Season (2026)

  1. elupiiiViewer

Leave a review

Next in the reel